The pens that bleed forever

What motivates a writer to write? What derives a writer to come up with bunches of ideas, viewpoints, and criticisms? In my view, it is very uncommon for a writer to keep quiet in-front of injustice. A writer’s pen becomes extremely expressive and sharply tear the components of injustice, and in further probe the causes of phenomenon. In fact, an emotional-sensitive writing plays a key role in bringing-up the facts to the light and seek means of actions that will stand strong to conclude practical solutions. In pertinence to this, a dramatic increase in the ‘dark journalism’ can be commonly observed and such dark journalists expose the real scenario in the dark spots inspected due to wars and other disasters. On the other hand, slum exposures articulate the sad facts about the slum destinations in the remote African and Asian nations. Contrarily, some writers have even narrated their desires and dreams about the Utopian states that remain imaginarily equal to the garden of Aden, and this where the perfect democracy is dreamt to prevail. After the concept of ‘expressive realism’ was introduced by Falubert and blazac in the writing literature, it seems that many writers have realized how to express naked truths without the boundaries of fantasy and romantic exposure. Arundhathi Roy is such an expressive realist who stands against to the myths of terrorism, gender’s play, and governmental responsibilities. She is just a best example that a writer’s bold words often get attacked by the waves of criticisms. In my view, writing can’t either be feministic or masculinistic, and it is just that it should either catch up a realistic view or fantasied narration. Such writers who persuade expressive realism in their articulations often find-out vulnerabilities that do prevail in the social systems and they question against to them, and of course their questions often get criticized, hinted, and unanswered. But their pens will keep on bleeding until the whole world turns to be Utopian.